- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44856 WP No. 29925 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 29925 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI NARAYANA V S/O SRI. VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, RESIDENT OF SARKARI UTTANAHALLI VILLAGE, VARUNA HOBLI, MYSORE TALUK, MYSORE DISTRICT - 571 311 … PETITIONER (BY SRI. KUMARASWAMY M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE VIDHANASOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISISONER MYSURU DISTRICT MYSURU - 570 001 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER MYSURU SUB-DIVISION, Digitally signed by VIJAYA P Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44856 WP No. 29925 of 2025 MYSURU DISTRICT MYSURU CITY - 570 001 4. THE TAHSILDAR MYSURU TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT - 570 001. … RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKHAR, AGA) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO A) ORDER DATED 28.08.2025 PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO.2 IN MYSDC- LND1/314/2025(E-960147) AT ANNEXURE - A AND B) ORDER DATED 21.09.2022 PASSSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3 ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, MYSURU SUB-DIVISION, MYSURU IN RA NO.11/2021 AT ANNEURE - B AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondents. 2. Though the petitioner has challenged the order at Annexure-A whereby the Deputy Commissioner has reserved certain lands for public purpose, petitioner submits that such order could not have been passed as the petitioner claims to have been granted with such land - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44856 WP No. 29925 of 2025 earlier. It is noticed that the petitioner has suffered an adverse order before the Assistant Commissioner at Annexure-B. 3. Learned Additional Government Advocate submits that as against the order of the Assistant Commissioner at Annexure-B, petitioner is to take appropriate proceedings challenging the same. In light of the order of the Assistant Commissioner not having been challenged before the Authority under the statutory scheme of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 petition deserves to be disposed of. 4. Accordingly, petitioner is reserved liberty to challenge the order of the Assistant Commissioner at Annexure-B which is an order adverse against him in accordance with law. It is clarified that there is no adjudication regarding the correctness of the order at Annexure-A. All contentions are kept open. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44856 WP No. 29925 of 2025 5. In light of the above, petition is disposed of. Registry to return the certified copy of the order, after retaining Xerox copies for reference. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE VP