Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 71679 (KAR)

SMT. B R MAMATHA v. SRI H R SURESHKUMAR URS

RPFC/106/2021 · 2025-07-18

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JULY 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI RPFC NO. 106 OF 2021 BETWEEN SMT. B. R. MAMATHA, W/O SRI H. R. SURESH KUMAR URS, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/AT #745, SUBASHNAGARA, CHAMUNDAESHWARI TEMPLE ROAD, HEBBAL, MYSURU – 570 016. ...PETITIONER/S (By SRI/SMT. : LAXMIKANTHA K. B., ADVOCATE) AND SRI H. R. SURESHKUMAR URS, S/O RAMACHANDRARAJE URS, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/AT #444, “PUSHKARNI”, 1ST FLOOR, 23RD MAIN, J. NAGARA, 2ND STAGE, NEAR JSS PUBLIC SCHOOL, MYSURU – 570 011. ...RESPONDENT/S …2 RPFC NO. 106 of 2021 2 RPFC FILED UNDER SEC.19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURT ACT., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 02.03.2020 PASSED IN CRL.MIS.NO.545/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT MYSURU, DISMISSING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SEC.125 OF CR.P.C., FOR MAINTENANCE. This RPFC coming on for Orders, this day the Court made the following Order. ORAL ORDER A week's time is granted to do the needful. By the time, if the needful is not done, the petition shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. Sd/- JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI NOTE : Vide Court Order dated 18.07.2025, office objections are not complied with. Hence, the petition is hereby dismissed. COPY Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By : SR R By : VS C By : GS Ty.Dt. : 31.01.2026 C.Dt : 11.02.2026