CWP-17590 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA (142) Gurman Singh State of Punjab CORAM: Present: KULDEEP TIWARI 1. Constitution of India, a prayer is made for issuance of a mandamus, upon the respondents, not to demolish the residential house of the petitioner, on account of the petitioner bei Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, offence under Sections 308 (2), 111, 61 (2) of BNS, 2023, and Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 (added later on), registered at Police Station S 2. petitioner has an apprehension that his residential house will be demolished, by the respondent only on account o 3. 4. accepts notice on behalf of the respondents No.1 to 3/State. 17590-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Gurman Singh Versus State of Punjab and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. Amit Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Teevar Sharma, AAG, Punjab for respondents No.1 to 3. **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(ORAL) Through the instant petition, cast under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, a prayer is made for issuance of a mandamus, upon the respondents, not to demolish the residential house of the petitioner, on account of the petitioner being involved in case FIR No. Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, offence under 308 (2), 111, 61 (2) of BNS, 2023, and Section 25 of the Arms Act, (added later on), registered at Police Station S Learned counsel for the petitioner informs this Court, that the petitioner has an apprehension that his residential house will be demolished, by the respondent-State, without complying the requisite legal requirements, only on account of the petitioner being an accused in the FIR (supra). Notice of motion. Mr. Teevar Sharma, learned AAG, Punjab, waives service and accepts notice on behalf of the respondents No.1 to 3/State. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-17590-2025 Date of Decision : 01.07.2025 …Petitioner Versus ...Respondents KULDEEP TIWARI Teevar Sharma, AAG, Punjab Through the instant petition, cast under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, a prayer is made for issuance of a mandamus, upon the respondents, not to demolish the residential house of the petitioner, on account ng involved in case FIR No.14 dated 14.02.2025 under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, offence under 308 (2), 111, 61 (2) of BNS, 2023, and Section 25 of the Arms Act, (added later on), registered at Police Station Sadar, Batala. Learned counsel for the petitioner informs this Court, that the petitioner has an apprehension that his residential house will be demolished, State, without complying the requisite legal requirements, f the petitioner being an accused in the FIR (supra). Mr. Teevar Sharma, learned AAG, Punjab, waives service and accepts notice on behalf of the respondents No.1 to 3/State. He, on Through the instant petition, cast under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, a prayer is made for issuance of a mandamus, upon the respondents, not to demolish the residential house of the petitioner, on account 14 dated 14.02.2025 under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, offence under 308 (2), 111, 61 (2) of BNS, 2023, and Section 25 of the Arms Act, Learned counsel for the petitioner informs this Court, that the petitioner has an apprehension that his residential house will be demolished, State, without complying the requisite legal requirements, Mr. Teevar Sharma, learned AAG, Punjab, waives service and He, on MANPREET SINGH 2025.07.02 16:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-17590 instructions imparted to him, from the quarter concerned, i.e. the respondent No.3, informs this Court, that the respondents have no intention to demolish the residential house of the petitioner. He further submits that the apprehension expressed by the pe respondents have no intention to demolish the residential house of the petitioner, without adopting due procedure of law. 5. counsel, learned counsel press the instant petition, at this stage. 6. pressed, at this stage. July 01, 2025 Manpreet 17590-2025 instructions imparted to him, from the quarter concerned, i.e. the respondent No.3, informs this Court, that the respondents have no intention to demolish the residential house of the petitioner. He further submits that the apprehension expressed by the petitioner, is without any basis, as the respondents have no intention to demolish the residential house of the petitioner, without adopting due procedure of law. In view of the specific statement suffered by the learned State counsel, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not wish to press the instant petition, at this stage. Consequently, the instant petition is pressed, at this stage. , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2 instructions imparted to him, from the quarter concerned, i.e. the respondent No.3, informs this Court, that the respondents have no intention to demolish the residential house of the petitioner. He further submits that the titioner, is without any basis, as the respondents have no intention to demolish the residential house of the petitioner, without adopting due procedure of law. In view of the specific statement suffered by the learned State for the petitioner submits that he does not wish to Consequently, the instant petition is dismissed being not (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No instructions imparted to him, from the quarter concerned, i.e. the respondent No.3, informs this Court, that the respondents have no intention to demolish the residential house of the petitioner. He further submits that the titioner, is without any basis, as the respondents have no intention to demolish the residential house of the In view of the specific statement suffered by the learned State for the petitioner submits that he does not wish to dismissed being not MANPREET SINGH 2025.07.02 16:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment