[2025:RJ-JP:24817] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2781/2020 1. Sanjay Kumar Sain S/o Shri Badriprasad, Aged 39 Years, R/o Village And Post Prathvipura Tehsil Malakheda Distt. Alwar. 2. Mohan Lal Meena S/o Shri Battan Meena, R/o Viletavas, Post Haldeena P.s. Umrain, Distt. Alwar. 3. Surendra Kumar Meena S/o Pappuram Meena, R/o Village Post Ratangarh Pala, P.s. Umrain, Distt. Alwar. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Zila Parishad Alwar, Through Chief Executive Officer 3. Panchayat Samiti Umrain, Distt. Alwar Through Development Officer 4. Gram Panchayat Prathvipura, Panchayat Samiti Umrain, Distt. Alwar Through Secretary. 5. Gram Panchayat Haldina, Panchayat Samiti Umrain, Distt. Alwar Through Secretary. 6. Gram Panchayat Ratangarh Pala, Panchayat Samiti Umrain, Distt. Alwar Through Secretary. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kailash Chander Sharma with Mrs. Nidhi Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Kesar Singh Shekhawat, AGC Mr. Ashok Yadav HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order 07/07/2025 On last date, i.e., 01.07.2025, following order was passed:- [2025:RJ-JP:24817] (2 of 2) [CW-2781/2020] “The matter comes up for payment of due salary to the petitioners. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that since, services of the petitioners were engaged through a placement agency with no privity of contract with the official respondents, this writ petition is not maintainable. He, therefore, prays that the writ petition be dismissed. None for the petitioners to oppose the prayer. However, in the interest of justice, the petitioners are granted one more opportunity to do so. List the matter on 07.07.2025 at top of the list as prayed.” Today also, learned counsel for the petitioners is not in a position to dispute that their services were hired through a placement agency with no privity of contract with the State Government. Therefore, in the aforesaid factual backdrop and the precedential law laid down by this Court in the case of Ram Khilari & Ors. versus State of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14835/2021 decided on 23.05.2025, the petitioners are not entitled for the relief claimed in the writ petition. The civil writ petition is dismissed accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J Manish/31