Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 71658 (PAT)

Mujib @ Md. Mujibur Rahman v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./60791/2025 · 2025-08-29

Satyavrat Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60791 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-303 Year-2024 Thana- DHAKA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Mujib @ Md. Mujibur Rahman S/o Late Ejhar @ Majrul Haque R/o Village- Lahan Dhaka, P.S.- Dhaka, District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md Ansiur Rahman For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Humayou Ahmad Khan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 29-08-2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(3), 190, 329(3), 324(4), 326(g), 109, 132, 221(1), 121(2) and 61(2) of the B.N.S.S. & Sections ¾ of Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that four labourers while opening the centering of the toilet in the newly constructed house of Mahabir died due to suffocation, on account of which, their family members and villagers became enraged when the victims were brought to the hospital and blocked the traffic and protested along with the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60791 of 2025(2) dt.29-08-2025 2/3 dead bodies and also attacked the doctors and vandalized the hospital and set the ambulance parked in the hospital on fire and even attacked the police force and the fire-brigade personnel who had reached the place of occurrence. 4. Learned counsel submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is further submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that no specific allegation is alleged against the petitioner. It is also submitted that since four persons died, as such the villagers were angry and a protest was made but then in every protest some lumpen elements are present. It is further submitted that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is not related to any of the four deceased and since his resides at the place of occurrence hence out of inquisitiveness had come to witness the occurrence when he came to be implicated. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. 6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60791 of 2025(2) dt.29-08-2025 3/3 anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Dhaka P.S. Case No.303/2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) B.N.S.S. amit/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T