- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30982 WP No. 19303 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION NO. 19303 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: M/S SPAN EDUTECH VENTURES PRIVATE LIMITED HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT RATHINAM TECHZONE CAMPUS, COIMBATORE EACHANARI, 641021, REPTD. BY ITS AUTHORISED SRI. NANDAN KUMAR K. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HIRAN KRISHNASWAMY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MR. RAKSHITH KUMAR S S/O C. SOMASHEKAR, AGED 26 YEARS, RESIDING AT 32/3, NEXT TO K C DC., SOMASANDRA PALYA, HSR LAYOUT POST, BANGALORE - 560 102. 2. MR. S KIRAN KUMAR, S/O C. SOMASHEKAR, R/AT 32/3, NEXT TO K C DC., SOMASANDRA PALYA, HSR LAYOUT POST, BANGALORE - 560 102. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. P B RAJU, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by SUMA B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30982 WP No. 19303 of 2025 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO 1. SET ASIDE THE INTERIM ORDER DATED 25.06.2025 (ENCLOSED AS ANNEXURE A) ON IA NO. 2/2025 (ENCLOSED AS ANNEXURE B) PENDING BEFORE THE HON'BLE LXXXVII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CCH-88, BENGALURU IN COMM. AA/207/2025 AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL ORAL ORDER After arguing the matter for some time, upon a query by this Court, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has neither put up any construction nor is he intending to put up any construction on the subject property till disposal of the application filed under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act. He submits that the only apprehension that the petitioner has in the matter is threat of forcible dispossession by the respondents. 2. In response, learned counsel for the respondents submits that the lease is terminated by issuing a notice which is subject matter of the lis. The - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30982 WP No. 19303 of 2025 respondents have not taken any steps to dispossess the petitioner illegally. As such, the apprehension of petitioner is misplaced. 3. Submission of the learned counsel for the parties is placed on record. In that view of the matter, no interference is warranted in the matter. The writ petition is disposed of. 4. All the contentions of the parties and their right to seek reliefs are kept open to be urged by the parties before the appropriate forum. 5. Pending applications be considered expeditiously by the trial Court. 6. In view of disposal of the petition, pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. Sd/- (M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE SKS