IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61919 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-238 Year-2025 Thana- SHAHPUR PATORI District- Samastipur ====================================================== 1. Shyam Jha S/o Late Ramikbla Jha R/o Village - Shahpur Undi, P.O - Shahpur Undi, P.S - Patory, District - Samastipur 2. Suntun Jha @ Ranjit Jha S/o Late Shyam Sundar Jha R/o Village - Shahpur Undi, P.O - Shahpur Undi, P.S - Patory, District - Samastipur 3. Amit Kumar Jha S/o Late Baleshwar Jha R/o Village - Shahpur Undi, P.O - Shahpur Undi, P.S - Patory, District - Samastipur 4. Pintu Jha @ Pawan Jha @ Ranjit Jha S/o Late Shyam Sundar Jha R/o Village - Shahpur Undi, P.O - Shahpur Undi, P.S - Patory, District - Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Abhay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Satya Nand Shukla, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 09-09-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State. 2. At the outset, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application qua petitioner No.1, namely Shyam Jha, is concerned. 3. Permission, as prayed for, is accorded. 4. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application stands dismissed as withdrawn qua petitioner No.1. 5. Rest of the petitioners (petitioner Nos.2 to 4) Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61919 of 2025(2) dt.09-09-2025 2/3 apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 109, 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 303(2), 352 and 351(2) of B.N.S., 2023. 6. Informant Raja Kumar Jha has alleged that on 08.06.2025, when his brother had gone to attend a feast, all the F.I.R. named accused persons assaulted him and snatched cash and jewellery. 7. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that allegation of assault is general and omnibus. Injury sustained by the injured is simple in nature. Rest of the allegations are ornamental. There is case and counter case between the parties. Petitioners 2 and 4 claim clean antecedent, whereas petitioner No.3 has only one antecedent. 8. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition. 9. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioners, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Shahpur Patory, in connection with Shahpur Patory P.S. Case No. 238 of 2025, subject to condition as laid Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61919 of 2025(2) dt.09-09-2025 3/3 down under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. K.C.Jha/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T