Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 71618 (ALL)

MALTI TRADERS THROUGH PROPRIETOR MALTI PANDEY v. KISHAN SONKAR

NA529/2088/2025 · 2025-08-07

Shekhar Kumar Yadav

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:134538 Court No. - 83 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 2088 of 2025 Applicant :- Malti Traders Through Proprietor Malti Pandey Opposite Party :- Kishan Sonkar Counsel for Applicant :- Shyam Murari Upadhyay Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J. 1. Heard Mr. Kunwar Mayank Singh, learned counsel for the applicants and learned Additional Government Advocate for the State. 2. By means of this application, the only prayer made by the applicant is that a direction be issued to the court of Upper Civil Judge (JD), Room No. 7 Varanasi to decide the CAse No. 77588 of 2024 (Malti Vs Kishan), under SEctions 138 of NI Act, P.S. Sarnath, District Varanasi within a short period. 3. I do not find any ground to pass such order looking to the fact that number of cases are pending before the trial court waiting for its logical conclusion and in the circumstances, no such direction can be issued to decide a particular case within a stipulated time. However, it is expected that the court below shall consider and decide of the matter pending before it in accordance with law without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties as expeditiously as possible. 4. With the aforesaid, the present application stands dismissed. Order Date :- 8.8.2025 RavindraKSingh Digitally signed by :- RAVINDRA KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad