- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37559 WP No. 20954 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 20954 OF 2023 (S-RES) BETWEEN: 1. BHAGIRATHI W/O LATE MOTE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/A NAVILLA HALLI VILLAGE AREHALLI HOBLI, BELURU TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT-573115. 2. SHRUTHI AM W/O MANNJUNATH D/O MOTE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS R/O # 650/21, 15TH CROSS SOMESWARA TEMPEL STREET BILEKAHALLI, BENGALURU SOUTH-560076. 3. SHARATH AM S/O LATE MOTE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS R/A NAVILLA HALLI VILLAGE AREHALLI HOBLI, BELURU TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT-573115. 4. SWATHI AM D/O LATE MOTE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS R/A NAVILLA HALLI VILLAGE AREHALLI HOBLI, BELURU TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT-573115. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. NAGENDRA NAIK R., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37559 WP No. 20954 of 2023 AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA COMMISSIONER OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION PUBLIC EDUCATION DEPARTMENT NRUPATUNGA ROAD BENGLAURU-560001 REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 2. HEAD MASTER YDNM SCHOOL, THOLALU BELURU TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT-573115. 3. BLOCK EDUCATIONAL OFFICER DEPARTMENT PUBLIC EDUCATION BELURU TALUK, BELURU HASSAN DISTRICT-573115. 4. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS OFFICE OF THE DDPI # 2433 8F7, DC OFFICE BM ROAD, RANGOLLI HALLA HASSAN-573201. 5. GRAMA BHARATI VIDYA SAMASTHE (R) THOLALU POST BELURU TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT-573115 REP BY ITS SECRETARY. 6. POSHAKARU MATHU SHIKSHAKARA SANGHA (R) S BIDARE, KADUR TALUK CHIKMAGALUR DIST-577146 REP BY ITS SECRETARY. 7. BLOCK EDUCATIONAL OFFICER DEPARTMENT PUBLIC EDUCATION - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37559 WP No. 20954 of 2023 BIRURU, KADUR TALUK CHIKMAGALUR DISTIRCT-577548. 8. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS OFFICE OF THE DDPI BELUR ROAD, CHIKAMAGALUR CHIKMAGALUR DISTRICT-577101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SIDHARTH BABU RAO., AGA FOR R1, R3, R4, R7 & R8: R2, R5 & R6 ARE SERVED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT DATED 18/04/2022 ISSUED BY THE R1 BEARING NO. C8(6) SHA SHI AA.NU.AA.NE.ANU/92/2021-22 AS PER ANNEXURE-A AND ENDORSEMENT DATED 25/05/2022 PASSED BY THE R8 BEARING NO. G1/SAA SHI EE/ANU PRAU.SHAALE/A.AA.NE/72/2021-22 AS PER ANNEXURE-B AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD ORAL ORDER This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenging the communication dated 18.04.2022 vide Annexure-A and the endorsement dated 25.05.2022 vide Annexure-B, whereby the request of the petitioner for appointment on compassionate grounds has been rejected. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37559 WP No. 20954 of 2023 2. The case of the petitioners is that, the father of petitioner Nos. 2 to 4, who was working as a Lab Technician died on 07.04.2017, while in service. Immediately thereafter, his wife filed an application on 03.04.2018 vide Annexure-D, seeking appointment on compassionate grounds to her son Sharath. Thereafter, Sharath, the son of the deceased employee has given an undertaking that he had no objection to give appointment to petitioner **No.2, who is the daughter of the deceased employee. The said application has been rejected only on the ground that, as on the date of death of the employee, there was no provision for giving an appointment to the married daughter. 3. This issue has been considered by this Court in the case of BHUVANESHWARI V.PURANIK vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA reported in reported in ILR 2021 KAR.5256. The operative portion of the order is extracted below: **Corrected vide Chamber order dated: 27.10.2025 - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37559 WP No. 20954 of 2023 “(i) I allow the writ petition and hold that the exclusion of married daughters from the ambit of expression ‘family’ in Rule 2(1)(a)(i), Rule 2(1)(b) and Rule 3(2)(i)(c) of the Karnataka Civil Services (Appointment on Compassionate Grounds) Rules, 1996 is illegal and unconstitutional being violative of Articles 14 and 15 of the Constitution. (ii) I accordingly, strike down the word “unmarried” in Rule 2(1)(a)(i), Rule 2(1)(b) and Rule 3(2)(i)(c) of the Karnataka Civil Services (Appointment on Compassionate Grounds) Rules, 1996. (iii) In consequence whereof, I direct the respondents to reconsider the claim of the petitioner for appointment on compassionate grounds. (iv) The State Government on such reconsideration shall pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law keeping in mind the observations made in the course of the order, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within one month from the date of receipt of copy of the order.” - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37559 WP No. 20954 of 2023 4. Thereafter, the Compassionate Appointment Rules, 1996 (for short, ‘1996 Rules’) has been amended on 09.04.2021, striking down the word ‘unmarried’ in Rule 2(1)(a)(i), Rule 2(1)(b) and Rule 3(2)(i)(c). 5. This issue has also been considered by a Division Bench of this Court in W.P.No.1321/2024. The relevant paragraph is extracted below: “7. In view of the said factual situation, we are of the opinion that the rejection of the application filed by the petitioner on the ground that the amendment dated 09.04.2021 is only prospective is not proper. We notice that the offending provision had been struck down by this Court in Bhuvaneshwari V. Puranik, supra. If that be so, the contention that the amendment dated 09.04.2021 is prospective make no difference to the situation since the provision which is struck down cannot be relied on by the respondents to reject the application.” 6. In view of the above, the endorsement issued by the respondents is liable to be quashed. - 7 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37559 WP No. 20954 of 2023 7. Accordingly, the following order is passed: (i) The writ petition is allowed. (ii) The impugned endorsement dated 25.05.2022, vide Annexure-B is quashed. (iii) The respondents are directed to consider the application submitted by the*petitioner No.2, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, not later than three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE CM LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 51 *Corrected vide Chamber order dated: 27.09.2025