Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 71602 (ALL)

AAKASH MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/9245/2025 · 2025-07-09

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:110258 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9245 of 2025 Petitioner :- Aakash Mishra Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vishal Kumar Sonkar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking following main prayers:- "i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned transfer order dated 14.06.2025 passed by the respondent no. 3. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in the peaceful service of the petitioner on his respective post till consideration of his pending own transfer request to the respondent no. 2." 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, after arguing at some length, without entering into merits of the case, made an innocuous prayer that his representation dated 24.05.2025, which is pending before respondent no.2/the Director, Training and Employment U.P. at Lucknow, may be directed to be decided in time bound manner. 3. Sri Santosh Kumar, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos.1 to 3 vehemently opposed the petition on merits, but has not opposed the innocuous prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Sri Santosh Kumar, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos.1 to 3 and perused the contents made in the writ petition and the documents on record. 5. Taking into consideration the submissions made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as no objection made on behalf of learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos. 1 to 3, I am of the view that respondent no.2/the Director, Training and Employment U.P. at Lucknow, is directed to decide the said representation dated 24.05.2025, which is pending before him, sympathetically in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 10.7.2025 Pratima (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRATIMA AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad