IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67753 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-135 Year-2025 Thana- SAKURABAD District- Jehanabad ====================================================== 1. Pappu Yadav S/o Yadu Yadav R/o Village - Meghu Bigha, P.S - Paras Bigha, District - Jehanabad 2. Rajanti Devi W/o Pappu Yadav R/o Village - Meghu Bigha, P.S - Paras Bigha, District - Jehanabad 3. Nitu Kumari D/o Surendra Singh R/o Village - Ibrahimpur, P.S - Shakurabad, District - Jehanabad 4. Vibhanath Kumar @ Vibhonath Kumar S/o Surendra Singh R/o Village - Ibrahimpur, P.S - Shakurabad, District - Jehanabad 5. Patasiya Devi W/o Surendra Singh R/o Village - Ibrahimpur, P.S - Shakurabad, District - Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Uday Yadav S/o Late Harivansh Yadav R/o Village - Meghu Bigha, P.S - Paras Bigha, District - Jehanabad ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr. Umesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 24-09-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 85, 109, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.. 3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that marriage of daughter of informant was solemnized with co-accused Ramesh Kumar as per Hindu rites and rituals. It is alleged that Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67753 of 2025(2) dt.24-09-2025 2/3 after marriage, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners, committed torture and harassment with daughter of informant due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry and later on, ousted her from her matrimonial house. 4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. Petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case merely because Petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 happen to be Nandosi (brother-in-law), Petitioner No. 2 happens to be married Nanad (sister-in-law), Petitioner No. 3 happens to be unmarried Nanad (sister-in-law), Petitioner No. 4 happens to be Bhaisur (brother-in-law) and Petitioner No. 5 happens to be mother-in-law of daughter of informant. Petitioners are victim of over implication. Petitioners are separate in mess and property and have got no concern with the affairs of the daughter of informant and her husband. There is no specific allegation of demand of dowry against these petitioners. Thrust of accusation is against husband of daughter of informant who is already in custody since 11.06.2025. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67753 of 2025(2) dt.24-09-2025 3/3 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and general and omnibus nature of accusation, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed. 7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Jehanabad in connection with Shakurabad P.S. Case No. 135 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.. shashank/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T