IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60284 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-250 Year-2025 Thana- JAMOBAZAR District- Siwan ====================================================== 1. Priyanshu Singh @ Priyanshu Kumar @ Priyanshu Kumar Singh Son of Rajeev Kumar singh @ Thakur singh Resident Of Village -Khauri pakad, Ps -Jamo Bazar, Dist- Siwan 2. Priyansh Singh @ Priyansh Kumar @ Priyansh @ Priyash Son of Rajeev Kumar singh @ Thakur Singh Resident Of Village -Khauri pakad, Ps -Jamo Bazar, Dist- Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Prashant Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Rajendra Singh Mr.Ajay Kumar Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 11-09-2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned APP for the State and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners, at the outset, seeks permission to withdraw the present anticipatory bail application with respect to petitioner no.2 namely, Priyansh Singh @ Priyansh Kumar, @ Priyansh @ Priyash who was arrested during pendency of the instant anticipatory bail application. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with respect to petitioner no.2 namely, Priyansh Singh @ Priyansh Kumar, @ Priyansh @ Priyash. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60284 of 2025(2) dt.11-09-2025 2/3 5. The petitioner no.1 seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118, 109, 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 21.06.2025, the accused persons including the petitioner surrounded him at 12.00 Noon and Priyanshu assaulted Vivek by daab causing injury on head, thereafter Rajeev assaulted Chhathu and Priyanshu assaulted Rohit by lathi on head, hand and leg causing injury. Further, Prinyanshu and Priyansh again assaulted Vivek on head causing injury. Further, the reason for the occurrence is that accused persons fraudulently got the land of his aunt executed in their favour. 7. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that on account of dispute relating to land the occurrence is alleged to have taken place. It is also submitted that petitioner is alleged to have assaulted Rohit causing grievous injury on his right proximal phalanks of right little finger. It is thus submitted that the assault was not on vital part of the body. 8. Learned A.P.P. as well as the learned counsel Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60284 of 2025(2) dt.11-09-2025 3/3 appearing on behalf of the informant opposes the anticipatory bail application, but then, they are not in a position to rebut the submission of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that the assault committed by petitioner no.1 was not on vital part of body of Rohit. 9. Considering the submissions and also taking into consideration the fact that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent, the petitioner no.1, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on anticipatory bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Siwan in connection with Jamo Bazar P. S. Case No.250 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. 10. The application stands allowed. vikash/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T