Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 71562 (BOM)

ARUN RAMCHANDRA CHOUGLE v. ALAKA ARUN KULKARNI AND ANR

APEAL/607/2018 · 2025-12-19

Shri Shivkumar Dige

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

508-APEAL-607-2018.DOC Harish IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.607 OF 2018 Arun Ramchandra Chougle ...Appellant Versus Alaka Arun Kulkarni And Anr. ...Respondents. ------- Ms. Pratiksha Chaugule i/b Sandip Koregave Advocate for the Appellant. Ms. Sakshi Jankar h/f Datta H. Pawar for Respondent No. 1. Mr. Anand Subhash Shalgaonkar, APP for the Respondent-State. ------- CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATE : 19th DECEMBER, 2025 P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for Appellant learned counsel for Respondent No. 1 and learned APP for the Respondent No.2-State. 2. Learned counsel for Appellant on instructions seeks leave to withdraw this Appeal with liberty to file Appeal before the learned Sessions Court as per the view of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case Celestium Financial Vs. Ghanasekaran Etc1. 3. Considering the submission of learned counsel for Appellant, Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. 4. Appeal is dismissed and disposed off as withdrawn. 5. Learned Sessions Court shall consider the delay, if Appeal is filed as Appeal was pending before this Court. (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) 1 2005 SC 2099 HARISH VITHAL CHAUDHARI Digitally signed by HARISH VITHAL CHAUDHARI Date: 2025.12.23 18:22:49 +0530