SRI. N. R. NANDAKUMAR v. SAS AAGRO OILS REFINERY PRIVATE LIMITED
WP/7800/2024 · 2025-11-20
S Vishwajith Shetty
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 71554 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 71554 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47982 WP No. 7800 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY WRIT PETITION NO. 7800 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
SRI N.R. NANDAKUMAR AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS S/O LATE N.V. RAMASETTY RESIDING AT NO.266 5TH MAIN, 4TH BLOCK JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 011. …PETITIONER (BY SRI GURUNATH T.S, ADV., - ABSENT) AND:
SAS AAGRO OILS REFINERY PRIVATE LIMITED HAVING OFFICE AT M.G. ROAD ARAVIND NAGAR, GAURIBIDANUR CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT - 561 208. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI N. BYOE GOWDA, ADV., FOR C/R)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 14TH FEBRUARY 2024 (ANNEXURE-P) PASSED IN COM. OS NO. 274/2022 BY THE LEARNED LXXXIX ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH-90), AND THE PERMIT THE PETITIONER TO LEAD FURTHER EVIDENCE OF THE WITNESS IN SUPPORT OF HIS CASE BY ISSUING A WRIT IN NATURE TO ACCEPT THE DOCUMENTS PRODUCED BY THE PETITIONER IN SUPPORT OF HIS CASE AND TO LEAD THE EVIDENCE AS PRAYED IN IA FILED UNDER ORDER XVIII RULE 17 OF CPC (ANNEXURE -N).
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
Digitally signed by NANDINI M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47982 WP No. 7800 of 2024
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY
ORAL ORDER
1. Matter called twice. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
2. On 10.11.2025, when the matter was listed before this Court, though there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, this Court finally granted a week's time to comply office objections failing which petition was directed to be listed before this Court for dismissal.
3. Inspite of a peremptory order passed by this Court, till date, office objections are not complied and there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, this Court has no other option but to dismiss the petition for non- prosecution. Accordingly, petition is dismissed for non- prosecution.
Sd/- (S VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE
DN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7