IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARi^ TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRU^§»^ TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN ■“O so ■■'to AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT APPEAL NO: 158 OF 20?fi Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent dated 06.12.2023 in W.P.No.38842 of 2013 on the file of the High Court. Between: P. A. Basheer, C-940088, APSRTC Conductor, S/o Chand years, Nandikotkur Depot, R/o. Nandikotkur, Kurnool District against the Order Basha, aged 38 . AP. ...Appellant/Petitioner AND rep by its Managing Director, Musheerabad, Hyderabad, presently at PNBS, Vijayawada, Krishna District 2. The Regional Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C., Kurnool Region, at Kurnool, Kurnool Dist., A.P. 1. The A.P.S.R.T.C , A.P. 3. The Dy. Chief Traffic Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C. O/o the Regional Manager, at Kurnool, Kurnool Dist., A.P 4. The Depot Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C. Nandikotkur Depot, Kurnool Dist. A.P ...Respondents/ Respondents Counsel for the Appellant: SRI S. M. SUBHAN Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: SRI ARAVALA RAMA RAO(SC FOR APSRTC) The Court made the following: JUDGMENT APHC010069762025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3516] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT APPEAL NO: 158/2025 Between: P A Basheer ...APPELLANT AND The Apsrtc and Others Counsel for the Appellant: 1.S M SUBHAN ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. ARAVALA RAMA RAO(SC FOR APSRTC KKAC) 2 HBKM,J & HVN,J W.A.No.l58of2025 % The Court made the following: JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice B. Krishna Mohan) Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. the order of the learned Single dated 06.12.2023, dismissing the writ petition effective and alternative remedy. 2. This writ appeal is preferred against Judge in W.P.No.38842 of 2013 on the ground of having an to interfere with the order of the permitted to avail the In view of the same, we see no reason learned single judge. However, the appellant i 3. IS alternative remedy as per law. There shall be no order as 4. Accordingly, this Writ Appeal is dismissed to costs. Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand As a sequel closed. Sd/- V.DIWAKAR deputy registrar C^li^OFFlCER //true copy// SE To, 1 One CC to Sri S. M. Subhan, Advocate [OPUC] Rao(SC for APSRTC) [OPUC] 2. One CC to Sri Aravala Rama 3. Three CD Copies. ssb HIGH COURT DATED:25/02/2025 JUDGMENT WA.No.158 of 2025 0 9 APR 2025 % a Col: ^ . Current Section DISMISSING THE W.A. WITHOUT COSTS