Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 71547 (ALL)

BANARASI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 9 OTHERS

WRIC/21352/2025 · 2025-07-09

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:109687 Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 21352 of 2025 Petitioner :- Banarasi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 9 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "1. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no. 2/ Commissioner Azamgarh Division Azamgarh to decide the Revision no. 292/A Computerized case no. C202515000000016 under section 219 of U.P. L.R. Act Banarasi versus Apar Ziladhikari and others within three month." 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that Revision no. 292/A Computerized case no. C202515000000016 under Section 219 of U.P. L.R. Act (Banarasi versus Apar Ziladhikari and others) is pending consideration before respondent No.2. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is for expeditious disposal of the same. 3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon respondent No.2 to decide Revision no. 292/A Computerized case no. C202515000000016 under Section 219 of U.P. L.R. Act (Banarasi versus Apar Ziladhikari and others), in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 4. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. Order Date :- 10.7.2025 Kushal Digitally signed by :- KUSHAL AGRAWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad