- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44172 RFA No. 219 of 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 03RD DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL No.219 OF 2008 (INJ) BETWEEN: THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, HEAD OFFICE, SANKEY ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. …APPELLANT (BY SRI RAVI G.SABAHIT, ADVOCATE -ABSENT) AND: SRI L RAVIKUMAR S/O LATE LAKSHMAN, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, SIDDAMMA BUILDING, 9TH MAIN ROAD, SHIVANAGAR, RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE- 560 010. …RESPONDENT (NOTICE TO RESPONDENT IS HELD SUFFICIENT) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 R/W ORDER XLIII RULE 1 OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 07.09.2006 PASSED IN OS.NO.3153/2002 ON THE FILE OF THE XVI ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE CITY, CCH.NO.12, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44172 RFA No. 219 of 2008 ORAL JUDGMENT Case called twice. None present on behalf of the appellant. 2. After demise of Sri K.N.Puttegowda, advocate, appellant has engaged the services of Sri Ravi G. Sabhahit, learned counsel. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant was absent even on the previous date of hearing. This Court, suo motu adjourned the matter to today from 10.10.2025. 4. Taking note of the fact that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal properly and suit is of the plaintiff for permanent injunction came to be decreed, this Court is of the considered opinion that the appeal needs to be dismissed for non prosecution. 5. Hence, appeal stands dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE kcm List No.: 1 Sl No.: 77