Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 71540 (KAR)

SRI PUTTAMADAIAH v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/11285/2025 · 2025-09-10

Sachin Shankar Magadum

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35767 CRL.P No. 11285 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM CRIMINAL PETITION NO.11285 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. PUTTAMADAIAH S/O DUNDEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT MARALAWADI HOBLI GUNDANAGOLLAHALLI RAMAPURA, K.H.KAVAL KARIKALDODDI RAMANAGAR-562 112. 2. SMT. JAYAMMA W/O PUTTAMADAIAH AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS 3. SRI.NAVEEN S/O PUTTAMADAIAH AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.76, GUNDANAGOLLAHALLI DODDASADENAHALLI KARIKALDODDI KANAKAPURA RAMANAGARA-562 112. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. CHETHAN B.P., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by AL BHAGYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35767 CRL.P No. 11285 of 2025 AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH HAROHALLI POLICE STATION RAMANAGARA DISTRICT REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU-560 001. 2. SMT. GOWRAMMA W/O LATE SHIVANNA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT GUNDANAGOLLAHALLI MARALAVADI HOBLI KANAKAPURA TALUK RAMANAGARA-562 112 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAHUL RAI, HCGP FPR R1) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE CHARGE SHEET FILED IN C.C.NO.789/2023 BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT, HAROHALLI POLICE, AGAINST THE PETITIONER FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 323, 324, 504, 506 R/W SECTION 34 OF IPC, AND ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS THERETO PENDING ON THE FILE OF PRL. CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN.) AND JMFC COURT, KANAKAPURA, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35767 CRL.P No. 11285 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners having argued the matter extensively, when this Court on examining the charge sheet was not inclined to grant indulgence, sought leave to withdraw the petition. Recording his submission, captioned petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending applications if any, are also disposed off. Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE ST List No.: 1 Sl No.: 52