Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Kerala · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7152 (KER)

RADHEESH KRISHNA R. S v. DISTRICT COLLECTOR

WP(C)/15316/2025 · 2025-04-10

Murali Purushothaman

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP(C) NO. 15316 OF 2025 1 2025:KER:31488 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN THURSDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 20TH CHAITHRA, 1947 WP(C) NO. 15316 OF 2025 PETITIONER: RADHEESH KRISHNA R. S AGED 46 YEARS S/O. RADHAKRISHNAN NAIR, SUJA BHAVAN, POREDOM P. O., CHADAYAMANGALAM, KOLLAM, NOW RESIDING AT TC22/ 2094, P87(1), PULLEKKONAM LINE 2, SASTHAMANGALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM., PIN - 695010 BY ADVS. M.V.KISHORE KUMAR K.P.MADHU RESPONDENTS: 1 DISTRICT COLLECTOR OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT COLLECTORATE, 2ND FLOOR CIVIL STATION BUILDING, CIVIL STATION ROAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA., PIN - 695043 2 DEPUTY COLLECTOR OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT COLLECTORATE, CIVIL STATION, KUDAPPANAKKUNNU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA, PIN - 695043 3 DEPUTY TAHSILDAR THIRUVANANTHAPURAM TALUK, SASTHAMANGALAM VILLAGE, TALUK OFFICE ROAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA ., PIN - 695023 4 DEPUTY TAHSILDAR XQXC+WQQ, MINI CIVIL STATION, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM, KERALA., PIN - 691506 5 VILLAGE OFFICER WP(C) NO. 15316 OF 2025 2 2025:KER:31488 SASTHAMANGALAM VILLAGE OFFICE, GX36+4MC, NCC ROAD, VAZHUTHACAUD, SASTHAMANGALAM VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM TALUK, TALUK OFFICE ROAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM., PIN - 695014 6 ARATHY AGED 37 YEARS W/O. RADHEESH KRISHNA, KUNNUMMEL HOUSE, CHEMMATTAM VAYAL, HOSDURG, BALLA, KASARAGOD, PIN- 671 531 NOW RESIDING AT C/O. SREYA RAGHAV, DD NEST, KATHRUKKADAVU, KALOOR, ERNAKULAM, DISTRICT., PIN - 682017 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO. 15316 OF 2025 3 2025:KER:31488 JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with the liberty to approach the concerned Family Court for appropriate relief. With the aforesaid liberty, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/-MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN JUDGE lsn