Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:110647 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9277 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rinki Shrivas And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arbind Kumar Soni,Virendra Singh Patel Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioners have prayed the following reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent authority to consider and decide the claimof the petitioners with regard to the payment of pay grade of Rs. 2800/- to the petitioners considering the judgment rendered in Writ-A No. 20255 of 2021 (Kamal Deep Nirala and others Vs. State of U.P. and others) within a short and stipulated period as may be specified by this Hon'ble Court. (ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent concern to take attention on the representation of the petitioners dated 12.06.2025, 10.06.2025, 10.06.2025 and 10.06.2025 in accordance with law. (iii) Issue any such other and further order which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case." 3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioners are entitled to the benefit of the judgment in the matter of Kamal Deep Nirala and others Vs. State of U.P. and others passed on 04.07.2023 in Writ A No. 20255 of 2021 as well as the judgment in the matter of Savita Devi and 9 others Vs. State of U.P. and 2 others passed on 10.10.2023 in Writ A NO. 12730 of 2023. 4. Learned Standing Counsel disputes the relief claimed by the petitioner on the ground that petitioners have been appointed subsequent to 01.12.2011 and hence cannot claim parity of the judgment of Kamal Deep Nirala and others (supra) and Savita Devi and others (supra). It is submitted that several representations are pending for consideration before the competent authority in the matter namely respondent no. 3. 5. In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with a direction to the respondent no. 3 will take a decision in the matter of claim of the petitioners strictly in accordance with law. An appropriate decision shall be taken in accordance with law either accepting the claim of the petitioners or rejecting the same. Appropriate decision shall be taken by the concerned authority within maximum period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of the order. Order Date :- 10.7.2025 Sharad/- Digitally signed by :- SHARAD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad