Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7151 (PNJ)

RAVI SHANKAR v. CHINMAI GARG

COCP/1485/2026 · 2026-05-21

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

COCP-1485 IN THE HI 113 Ravi Shanka Chinmai Gar CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP   order dated 36917-2025, whereby the 12.08.2025 opportunity o 2. submits that (Annexure representatio have been re nothing surv 3. Court is take 1485-2026 -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H COCP Date o hankar Versus ai Garg M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. Jatinder Kumar, Advocate f Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G. I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been f dated 10.12.2025 (Annexure P-1) pass 2025, titled as ‘Ravi Shankar vs. St by the respondent was directed to dec 2025 and 28.11.2025 submitted by t tunity of hearing to the petitioner and b At the very outset, learned cou ts that in compliance of the Writ C xure P-1), Speaking order dated entations dated 12.08.2025 and 28.11. een rejected by providing him an opp g survives in the instant petition. Copy of Speaking Order dated is taken on record. ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-1485-2026 Date of Decision: 21.05.2026 .… Petitioner .... Respondent NIDHI GUPTA ocate for the petitioner. l. A.G., Haryana. been filed alleging violation of the ) passed by the Writ Court in CWP- State of Haryana and another’ to decide the representations dated d by the petitioner, after providing r and by passing a speaking order. ed counsel for the respondent-State rit Court order dated 10.12.2025 dated 18.05.2026 whereby the 28.11.2025 moved by the petitioner an opportunity of hearing. As such, r dated 18.05.2026 handed over in the ’ ated ding tate the oner uch, r in RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.22 20:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-1485 4. the petitione whereafter o 5. 6. required to b of, according 7. Speaking O 8. 9. 21.05.2026 rishu 1485-2026 -2- A copy thereof, has been hande titioner who admits that the petitio after order dated 18.05.2026 had been Heard. In view of the facts noted ed to be passed in the present petition ordingly. The petitioner would be at libe Order, in accordance with law, if s Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable handed over to learned counsel for petitioner was called for hearing; been passed. above, no further orders are tition; and the same stands disposed at liberty to challenge the aforesaid , if so advised. any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE ned Yes/No Yes/No l for ing; are sed said RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.22 20:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.