CRL MP No. 22155 of 2025 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 18-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL MP No. 22155 of 2025 in CRL OP No.28788 of 2025 K.Jude Sekhar S/o.Late Kantharaj, Residing at P-33, Arihant Heirloom, Thalambur, Chennai-600 130. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. Sakthivel S/o. Natarajan, Plot No.81, Maruvoor Avenue, Pallipettai Village, Acharapakkam,Chengalpattu. 2. The State Rep by, The Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch, Tambaram, Chennai. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS to cancel the bail granted to the 1st respondent/accused in Crl.O.P.No.28788/2025 dated 23.10.2025 and pass any other order in the interest of justice. For Petitioner(s): M/S. K.F.Manavalan For Respondent(s): MR.N.PALANIVEL, GOVT.ADVOCATE (CRL.SIDE) FOR R2 MS.SARADA M. AJITH FOR M/S.T.SAI KRISHNAN for R1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL MP No. 22155 of 2025 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER This petition has been filed seeking cancellation of the bail granted to the 1st respondent by this Court in Crl.O.P. No.28788 of 2025, by order dated 23.10.2025. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the 1st respondent has misrepresented before this Court and obtained bail. It was further contended that the petitioner is not a bonafide purchaser and that no power of attorney was executed in favour of any person, and therefore the submission of the 1st respondent that he had derived title to the property under a power of attorney executed by the petitioner is false. It was further submitted that several misrepresentations were made in the power of attorney deed. 3. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that the final report has been e-filed on 22.10.2025. 4. While looking into the factual position, it is seen that the 1st respondent was remanded to judicial custody on 15.09.2025 and this Court granted bail only on 23.10.2025. Though the learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the 1st respondent had misrepresented before this Court, a perusal of paragraph No.3 of the order dated 23.10.2025 made in Crl.O.P. No.28788 of https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL MP No. 22155 of 2025 __________ Page3 of 4 2025 shows that this Court has considered the said aspect only as part of his defence, and there is no material to establish any deliberate misrepresentation. 5. It is a well-settled principle of law that an order granting bail can be interfered with only if there are strong and compelling reasons. In the present case, the grounds raised by the petitioner for cancellation of bail are not substantiated or convincing. Hence, this Court does not find any merit in this petition. 6. Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition stands dismissed. 18-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No dpa 1.The Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch, Tambaram, Chennai. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL MP No. 22155 of 2025 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. dpa CRL MP No. 22155 of 2025 in CRL OP No.28788 of 2025 18-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis