Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010070852019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 3175/2019
Between:
1.
K SURYA KANTHAM, W.G DIST
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, GUNTUR.
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, WEST GODAVARI DIST. ELURU.
3. THE STATIN HOUSE OFFICER, GANAPAVAAM POLICE STATION, GANAPAVARAM W.G.DIST.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.
MANGENA SREE RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following:
2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION No.3175 OF 2019
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief:
“….issue a writ, order or a direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not registering petitioners report dt.28.02.2019 on the file of 3rd police station as illegal, irregular arbitrary violative of the provisions of the Criminal Procedure code and also offends articles 14, 21 of Constitution of India consequently direct the 3rd respondent to register the case under the provisions of criminal procedure code and pass…”
2. Heard learned counsel representing Sri Mangena Sree Rama Rao, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that no information is available with the petitioner to show that the Station House Officer received the report.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in light of said circumstances, the writ petition can be closed giving liberty to the petitioner to approach either police or concerned Court for necessary redressal in accordance with law.
5. Considering the same, the writ petition is closed. The petitioner is at liberty to approach to the concerned police or Magistrate for necessary redressal in accordance with law.
6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
3
As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 15.09.2025 Pmk
4
24 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION No:3175 OF 2019
Date: 15.09.2025
Pmk