PRADEEP KUMAR SACHAN v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/21259/2025 · 2025-09-22
Prakash Padia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 71503 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 71503 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 21259 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.
1. Today when the matter is taken up, it is very fairly informed by learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner that due to subsequent development the present writ petition has become infructuous.
2. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. September 23, 2025 Arti Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Hari Prakash Pal, Ved Prakash Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Hari Narayan Singh (Prakash Padia,J.) Pradeep Kumar Sachan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARTI SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad