ASHOK BAJIRAO KHADE AND ANR v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THOUGH ITS PRIN. SECRETARY, DEPT. OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND ORS
PIL/182/2022 · 2025-11-20
Shri Ajit B Kadethankar, Shri M S Karnik
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 71474 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 71474 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
19-PIL-182-2022.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 182 OF 2022 Ashok Bajirao Khade And Anr … Petitioners Versus State of Maharashtra And Ors … Respondents
—————— Adv. Shruti Ghodake and Adv. Reshma Adnaik i/by Mr. Dhairyasheel Sutar for the Petitioners. Ms. Neha Bhide, GP for the Respondent-State. Petitioner present in Court. ——————
Coram : M. S. Karnik & Ajit B. Kadethankar, JJ. Date : November 20, 2025.
P. C. :
1. We have perused the order dated 3rd January, 2023 passed by this Court.
2.
Learned Counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions of the Petitioner who is present in the Court, submits that the Petitioner is not in a position to deposit the amount of Rs. 2 lakhs.
3. We are therefore not inclined to entertain the present PIL at the instance of the petitioner. However, should the petitioner prefer a Shubham Talle 1 of
2 TALLE SHUBHAM ASHOKRAO Digitally signed by TALLE SHUBHAM ASHOKRAO Date: 2025.11.21 13:39:16 +0530
19-PIL-182-2022.doc representation to Respondent Nos. 3 and 4, bringing to their notice the factum of the alleged illegal/unauthorized structures along with the necessary details, Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 shall consider such representation and take suitable action, and carry the matter to its logical conclusion, in accordance with law, expeditiously.
4. Public Interest Litigation disposed of. [ Ajit B. Kadethankar, J. ] [ M. S. Karnik, J. ] Shubham Talle 2 of
2