Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 71470 (PNJ)

HARDEEP SINGH ALIAS LADDI v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/33536/2025 · 2025-07-08

N S Shekhawat

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-33536-2025 -1- 229 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-33536-2025 Date of Decision:08.07.2025 HARDEEP SINGH ALIAS LADDI …PETITIONER VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS …RESPONDENTS Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present : Mr. D.P.S. Bajwa, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajiv Sidhu, DAG, Haryana *** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner had filed the present petition under Section 482 BNSS with a prayer to grant of anticipatory bail to him in case FIR No.594 dated 03.12.2024, under Sections 25 of Arms Act 1985 and under Sections 109(1), 111(3), 190, 191(3) & 287 of BNSS, 2023 registered at Police Station Kurukshetra University Kurukshetra, District Kurukshetra. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that even though his earlier bail application was dismissed by this Court, however, now the matter has been amicably resolved between the parties. He further submits that the petitioner is ready to join the investigation. 3. On the other hand, learned State counsel has vehemently opposed the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner on the ground that VIPIN KUMAR 2025.07.10 09:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order CRM-M-33536-2025 -2- serious allegations have been levelled against the present petitioner and he does not deserve the concession of bail by this Court. 4. However, Mr. Purshotam, Advocate has appeared on behalf of respondent No.2/complainant and submits that he has no objection in case the present petition is allowed. 5. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 6. Since the petitioner has compromised the case with the injured in the present case, the custodial interrogation of the petitioner may not be required. 7. Thus, without commenting any further, the petition is allowed and the petitioner is granted concession of anticipatory bail, subject to the conditions as provided under Sections 482 (2) of B.N.S.S. It will be open for the Investigating Officer to call the petitioner to join the investigation, if so required, by issuing a written notice in this regard and they shall abide by the conditions mentioned in Section 482 (2) of B.N.S.S. 08.07.2025 (N.S. SHEKHAWAT) vipin JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No VIPIN KUMAR 2025.07.10 09:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order