- - 1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2025 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S.KAMAL & SRI. K.RAJASHEKAR, MEMBER R.F.A. 293/2022 (Lok Adalat No.8081/2025) BETWEEN: 1. THE KARNATAKA STATE JUDICIAL EMPLOYEES HOUSE BUILDING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED NO.7/2, 'SURYA CHAMBERS' 2ND FLOOR, 1ST MAIN ROAD SHESHADRIPURAM, BENGALURU - 560 020 REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE PRESIDENT THE KARNATAKA STATE JUDICIAL EMPLOYEES HOUSE BUILDING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED NO.7/2, 'SURYA CHAMBERS' 2ND FLOOR, 1ST MAIN ROAD SESHADRIPURAM, BENGALURU - 560 020 REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. ...APPELLANTS (BY SMT. B.V. VIDYULATHA., ADVOCATE) - - 2 AND: SMT. GEETHA NARAYAN SWAMY W/O SRI. D. NARAYAN SWAMY AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS R/O NO.41/2, 1ST CROSS CHOWDAIAH BLOCK, R.T NAGAR BANGALORE - 560 032. ……RESPONDENT (BY SRI. RAGHU PRASAD B.S. ADVOCATE FOR C/RESPONDENT) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30.10.2021 PASSED IN O.S.3879/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE VI ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE BENGALURU CITY, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR DECLARATION AND POSSESSION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: CONCILIATION ORDER Smt. B.V. Vidyulatha, learned counsel for the appellants along with Vice president of the appellant-Co-operative society is present. 2. Respondent-Smt. Geetha Narayana Swamy, along with Sri. Raghavendra. K, learned counsel for the respondent is personally present. 3. Parties and learned counsel for the appellants submit that they have settled the dispute amicably and they have filed compromise petition, terms of the which reads as under: - - 3 '' 8. The Appellant Society undertakes that it would execute and register a sale deed pertaining to site no.701/С (schedule property) to the husband of Respondent after the layout plan pertaining to Judicial Layout, Yelahanka which is submitted by the respondent society to the BDA and State Government is approved as per directions issued by the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in its order dated 01.06.2016 in W.P.No.40994/2002 (GM-RES) c/w CCC.No.87/2004 (Civil). 9. All expenses relating to execution and registration of the said sale deed to be executed in favour of Husband of Respondent shall be borne by Respondent. 10. The parties to the above appeal have decided to compromise in the above matter in order to end the long running litigation between themselves from more than 15 years. 11. The Appellant shall assist and provide necessary support to the Respondent in obtaining the requisite documents for securing the Khatha in respect of the Schedule Property after sale deed is executed and registered infavour of husband of Respondent. All expenses incurred for obtaining the Khatha shall be borne by the Respondent. 12. As stated above the above compromise petition is filed only to bring an end to a long pending litigation and there is no element of fraud or misrepresentation or collusion between the parties. 13. The parties undertake to abide by the terms of this compromise and not to violate any of the conditions stipulated herein. 14. The compromise has been entered into voluntarily by both parties without any coercion or undue influence and with full understanding of its implications. 15. This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to record the above compromise under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with - - 4 Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, and pass a Judgment and decree in terms of the same. 16. The parties agree that in view of the settlement arrived at in the Lok-adalath, entire court fee paid in the above appeal may be refunded to the appellant. 4. Parties have understood the terms of the compromise, the terms of the compromise do not appear to be contrary to any provisions of law. Accordingly, compromise petition is taken on record. 5. Appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise petition. 6. Draw decree accordingly. 7. Permissible Court fee be refunded to the appellant on proper identification. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER RL