134 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.17614 of 2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 07.08.2025 MEENAKSHI .....Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ........Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA Present: Mr. Munish Mittal, Advocate for the petitioner. * * * * * ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (Oral) The petitioner is seeking a direction to respondents No.2 and 3 to grant her permission to access her retail outlet through the road dividing the sector, in terms of the policy issued by the respondents. 2. Issue notice to the respondents. 3. Mr. Siddharth Gupta, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2 and Ms. Ashna Singh, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.3. 4. Learned counsel for respondent No.3 submits that the application of the petitioner is being considered and the petitioner has been asked to submit an undertaking for acceptance of the conditions, vide communication dated 17.07.2025 issued by the respondent-HSIDC. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already submitted an undertaking in terms of the communication dated 17.07.2025. SANDEEP KUMAR 2025.08.07 15:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CWP No.17614 of 2025 (O&M) --2-- 6. In view of the afore-noted facts and circumstances when the application of the petitioner is under consideration, we deem it appropriate to dispose of this petition with a direction to respondent No.3 to consider and decide the application of the petitioner, in accordance with law, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. (ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE (DEEPAK MANCHANDA) JUDGE 07.08.2025 sandeep Whether Speaking/Reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No SANDEEP KUMAR 2025.08.07 15:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.