Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27783 CRL.P No. 9981 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9981 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
AXIS BANK LTD., A BANKING COMPANY.
CARRYING ON THE BANKING BUSINESS UNDER THE BANKING REGULATION ACT, 1949.
INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 AND HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT TRISHUL.
3RD FLOOR, OPP SAMARTHESHWAR TEMPLE.
LAW GARDEN, ELLIS BRIDGE.
AHMEDABAD - 380 006.
GUJARAT, AND HAVING ONE OF ITS BRANCH OFFICE AT GROUND FLOOR, CHAK NO.1, KHASRA NO.4531, BHATI PLAZA, MARUDHAR, KESARI ROAD, SOJAT.
DISTRICT PALI, RAJASTHAN 306 104.
REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH HEAD, MR. NIKUL RAWAL AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, ALSO AT S/O VISHNU RAWAL, NAYA BAJAR, BHATAKARA, SIROHI RAJASTHAN-307001 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. UNNIKRISHNAN M.,ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA HULIMAVU POLICE STATION, ELECTRONIC CITY SUB-DIVISION, BANGALORE DISTRICT.
Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27783 CRL.P No. 9981 of 2025
REPRESENTED BY SPP HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE 01.
2.
SRI. AVINASH ANANT MANAGOLI, S/O. ANANT MANAGOLI, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, RESIDING AT FLAT NO.FF3, 1ST FLOOR, AKSHAYA KUTEERA B BLOCK, 5TH CROSS, NEAR KUKKE SUBRAMANIYAM MUTT, AKSHAY NAGAR, BENGALURU CITY, KARNATAKA 560 068.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI CHANNAPPA ERAPPA HCGP FOR R1 NOTICE TO R2 IS DISPENSED WITH)
CRL.P FILED U/S 482 CR.P.C (U/S 528 BNSS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE
ORDER DTD 02.07.2024 PASSED BY THE HONBLE COURT OF THE 9th ACJM, BENGALURU IN CR.NO.206/2024 i.e., ANNEXURE-C IN TERMS OF WHICH THE PETITIONER IS
DIRECTED TO DEFREEZE THE SAVINGS/CURRENT ACCOUNT BEARING A/C NO.923010027668161 MAINTAINED IN THE PETITIONERs BANK AND TRANSFER THE SAME TO THE ACCOUNT OF THE RESPONDENT
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
ORAL ORDER In this petition, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs:
“a) To set-aside the Order, Dated 02.07.2024 passed by the Hon’ble Court of the 9th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bengaluru, in Crime No.206/2024 i.e.,
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27783 CRL.P No. 9981 of 2025
Annexure-‘C’ in terms of which, the petitioner is directed to defreeze the Savings/current account bearing A/c. No.923010027668161 maintained in the Petitioner’s Bank and transfer the same to the account of the Respondent No.2. b) To pass such other orders as may be deemed expedient in the circumstance of the case and in the interest of justice.”
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned HCGP for 1st respondent and perused the material on record. For the order proposed, notice to 2nd respondent is dispensed with. 3. In addition to reiterating the various contentions urged in the memorandum of petition and referring to the material on record, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue in controversy involved in the present petition is directly and squarely covered by the judgment of the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Axis Bank Ltd., Vs. The State of Karnataka and Anr. – Crl.P.No.1787/2023 dated 14.12.2023 and the present petition may be disposed of in the above terms. 4. As rightly contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the issue in controversy in the present petition is covered
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27783 CRL.P No. 9981 of 2025
by the judgment of this Court in the case of Axis Bank Ltd. Supra, wherein it is held as under:
“The Petitioner which is a Financial Institution is before this Court challenging the order passed by 1st Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate on an application filed under Sections 451 and 457 of Cr.P.C. by the complainant/respondent No.2 directing the petitioner-Bank to defreeze the amount belonging to the accused and transfer the said amount to the bank account of the complainants/respondent No.2. 2. The petitioner’s concern is that the order passed by the Jurisdictional Magistrate cannot be executed because it surpasses the specified release amount, and numerous courts across the Country have issued directives to the investigating agencies to unfreeze the bank accounts of the accused therein. 3.
Learned Special Public Prosecutor on instructions would suggest that the matter may be remanded to the Jurisdictional Courts to consider the application filed under Sections 451 and 457 of Cr.P.C. afresh, by affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 4. Admittedly, multiple cases are registered against the accused herein within the State and across the country and there are multiple orders passed by the Jurisdictional Magistrates directing the petitioner to unfreeze the account of the accused and
- 5 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27783 CRL.P No. 9981 of 2025
transfer the amount to the bank account of the complainants. The passing of multiple orders has caused difficulty to the petitioner/bank in executing the said order, since the amount ordered to be released in some accounts exceeds the amount available in the subject accounts of the accused. Therefore, the learned Magistrate before passing an
order directing the petitioner to unfreeze and transfer the amount to the accounts of the complainants, is required to hear the petitioner. Accordingly, I pass the following:
ORDER i. Criminal Petition is allowed. ii. The order dated 26.11.2021 passed by the 1st Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru in Cr.No.452/2021 is hereby set aside. iii. Matter is remanded to 1st Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru to reconsider the application filed under Sections 451 and 457 of Cr.P.C. afresh, after giving the opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.
5. Till the application is disposed of, the petitioner/bank is restrained from releasing the money in favour of any person from the subject account.”
5. In view of the above, petition is disposed of in terms of the order passed in Axis Bank Ltd.’s case supra.
- 6 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27783 CRL.P No. 9981 of 2025
6. Accordingly, I pass the following:
ORDER (i) Petition is hereby allowed. (ii) The order dated 02.07.2024 passed by the 9th ACJM, Bangalore, in Crime No.206/2024 is hereby set aside. (iii) Matter is remitted back to the 9th ACJM, Bangalore, to reconsider the application filed under Sections 451 and 457 of Cr.P.C. afresh, after giving a n opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. (iv) Till the application is disposed of, the petitioner - bank is restrained from releasing the money in favour of any person from the subject account.
Subject to the aforesaid observations and directions, the petition stands disposed of.
Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE
BKM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26