Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRWP-6703-2025 (O&M) --1-- (133) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-6703-2025 (O&M) Decided on:-25.06.2025 Subhash Kumar ....Petitioner.. vs. State of Haryana and others ....Respondents. CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr. Jagjit Singh Gill, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** HARKESH MANUJA J. (Oral)
1. The present Criminal Writ petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondents No.1 to 4 so as to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner at the hands of respondent No.5.
2. Upon advance notice, Mr. Amit Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana, appears on behalf of respondents No.1 to 4. Requisite copies of the petition have already been supplied to the respondents-State by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
3. From the perusal of record, it is made out that the petitioner was being sought to be implicated in FIR No.134 dated 13.06.2025, on the basis of disclosure statement made by Gursewak Singh, as per which, some amount was taken by the petitioner as well, however, a perusal of record shows that the complainant of the FIR has already entered into a settlement SONIKA 2025.06.25 15:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
CRWP-6703-2025 (O&M) --2-- (Annexure P-3) with said Gursewak Singh for the reason that Gursewak Singh has already satisfied the claim of complainant having compensated him. Furthermore, even the complainant-Jagdish Rai has furnished an affidavit (Annexure P-4) that nothing remains pending against Gursewak Singh. 4 Though, no representation has been moved prior to filing of the instant petition by the petitioner, however, considering the facts and circumstances of the case in hand, this petition be treated as representation. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.2 to look into the grievances unfolded by the petitioner in this criminal writ petition and to decide the same within three days by passing a speaking order more particularly by taking into consideration both the document of settlement as well as the affidavit of complainant-Jagdish Rai (Annexures P-3 & P-4 respectively).
5. A copy of this petition be sent to the respondents for compliance in the aforesaid context. 25.06.2025 (HARKESH MANUJA) sonika JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/ No SONIKA 2025.06.25 15:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document