138 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT SANGRAM SINGH STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Lulip Gupta, Advocate with Ms HARKESH MANUJA 1. By way of present petition Constitution of India nature of mandamus directin security to the petitioner and als the petitioner and his family members. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that instead of pressing the present petition on merits, his client would be satisfied in case direction is issued to the respondents to representation (Annexure P passing a speaking order expeditiously. 3. Prayer seems to be justified. 4. Upon advance notice, who has joined the proceedings through video confere behalf of respondents and raises no objection to the innocuous prayer made on behalf of the petitioner. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: SANGRAM SINGH Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Lulip Gupta, Advocate with . Deify Jindal, Advocate for the **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) By way of present petition filed under Constitution of India, prayer has been made for issuance of nature of mandamus directing the respondents to provide security to the petitioner and also ensure protection and his family members. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that instead of pressing the present petition on merits, his client would be satisfied in case direction is issued to the respondents to representation (Annexure P-3) moved at the instance of petitioner by passing a speaking order expeditiously. Prayer seems to be justified. Upon advance notice, Mr. Siddharth Sandhu, AAG, Punjab who has joined the proceedings through video confere behalf of respondents and raises no objection to the innocuous prayer n behalf of the petitioner. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-6730-2025 Date of Decision: June 25, 2025 ........Petitioner ........Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Advocate for the petitioner. under Articles 226/227 of the prayer has been made for issuance of a writ in the g the respondents to provide adequate ensure protection of life and liberty of At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that instead of pressing the present petition on merits, his client would be satisfied in case direction is issued to the respondents to decide the t the instance of petitioner by ddharth Sandhu, AAG, Punjab who has joined the proceedings through video conferencing accepts on behalf of respondents and raises no objection to the innocuous prayer 2025 Articles 226/227 of the a writ in the of At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that instead of pressing the present petition on merits, his client would be the t the instance of petitioner by ddharth Sandhu, AAG, Punjab on behalf of respondents and raises no objection to the innocuous prayer TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.06.25 15:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-6730-2025 -2- 5. In view of the agreed stand taken by both sides, but without going into the merits of the controversy, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3-Senior Superintendent of Police, Tarn Taran to look into the representation (Annexure P-3) and take appropriate action in accordance with law by passing a speaking order preferably within a period of 04 (four) weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 6. The aforesaid direction shall not be treated as an expression of opinion on the merits of the averments made in the representation. 25.06.2025 (HARKESH MANUJA) Tejwinder JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.06.25 15:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document