Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 71446 (ALL)

INDAL v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/23382/2025 · 2025-08-19

Ashutosh Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:142385 Court No. - 66 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 23382 of 2025 Applicant :- Indal Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Raj Kumar Sharma,Sunil Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Ashutosh Srivastava,J. Heard Shri Sunil Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Arimardan Yadav, learned AGA for the State-respondents and perused the record. This bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been moved on behalf of accused- applicant, Indal, seeking enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 33 of 2025, under Sections 105, 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Police Station Mangalpur, District Kanpur Dehat. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the accused- applicant is innocent. He has been falsely implicated in this very case crime number and is languishing in jail since 24.1.2025. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that there is no eye witness of the alleged occurrence. The prosecution story has been developed only on the basis of hearsay evidence as is evident from the statement of witnesses. The applicant and deceased are related to each other. Owing to old enmity, first informant has roped the applicant in the present case. There is no witness on the record, who has seen the applicant for causing injuries to the deceased, resulting in death. He has one case of criminal antecedent, which has sufficiently been explained and there is no likelihood of his fleeing from course of justice or tampering with evidence in case of release on bail. Hence, bail has been prayed for. Learned AGA has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail. Considering all above facts and circumstances, the nature of accusations, severity of the punishment in the case of conviction and nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witness and prima facie case, but without commenting on merit of case, a case for bail is made out. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Let the accused-applicant, Indal, involved in above mentioned case crime number be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each, in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence. 2. The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity. 3. The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and co-operate in the trial. 4. The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his personal appearance is exempted through counsel by the court concerned. In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel his bail. Order Date :- 20.8.2025 Ravi Prakash (Ashutosh Srivastava, J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad