Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 71429 (KAR)

SRI SATHISH CHANDRA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/36585/2018 · 2025-12-05

Rajesh Rai K

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51129 WP No. 36585 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K WRIT PETITION NO. 36585 OF 2018 (LR) BETWEEN: SRI. SATHISH CHANDRA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS S/O LATE SHANTA R/O MUDRADI VILLAGE, KARKALA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. K PRASANNA SHETTY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY , REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. THE LAND TRIBUNAL KARKALA, KARKALA TALUK UDUPI DISTRICT. 3. SRI. ARAVIND HEGDE AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS S/O K. HIRIYANNA HEGDE R/O BALLADI, MUDRADI VILLAGE, KARKALA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT. Digitally signed by JAI JYOTHI J Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51129 WP No. 36585 of 2018 4. SMT. VANAJA SHEDTHI AGED MAJOR W/O LATE KRISHNAIAH SHETTY, R/O BALLADI, MUDRADI VILLAGE, KARKALA TALUK UDUPI DISTRICT. 5. HARINAKSHI AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS D/O LATE K. HIRIYANNA HEGDE 6. UDAY SOODA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS S/O LATE K. HIRIYANNA HEGDE 7. RAMANI AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS D/O LATE K. HIRIYANNA HEGDE ALL ARE RESIDING AT MUDRADI VILLAGE AAJEKAARU HOBLI, KARKALA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT - 576 124. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAHUL CARIYAPPA K.S., AGA FOR R1 AND R2; SRI. NAGARAJA HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R3, R5 TO R7; VIDE ORDER DATED 20.06.2022, DECD. R4 NOT A NECESSARY PARTY) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 27.04.2017 PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT LAND TRIBUNAL KARKALA ONLY IN SO FAR AS NO.TRL/208/80-81 (ANNEXURE-A) AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51129 WP No. 36585 of 2018 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo for withdrawal of the petition stating that dispute involved in the writ petition is settled out of the Court. He has filed affidavit to that effect. Placing reliance of the memo and affidavit, Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE GPG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19