APHC010070502006 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3367] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V SRINIVAS SECOND APPEAL NO: 1383/2006 Between: Talluri Venkata Subba Rao ...APPELLANT AND Talluri Veera Venkata Satya Krishna Mohan and Others ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant: 1. . Counsel for the Respondents: 1. N SIVA REDDY The Court made the following: 2 JUDGMENT: A perusal of the proceeding sheet shows that, on 17.06.2025, this Court passed the following order: “No fresh vakalat filed for the appellant in the place of Sri O.Manohar Reddy, since he was designated as Senior Counsel. Learned Counsel representing for the appellant would submit that letter was addressed to the appellant, but so far no reply is received. List the matter on 23.07.2025 under the caption „for dismissal”. Even today also, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. Learned Counsel for the respondents is present. This indicates that the appellant has no interest in prosecuting the Second Appeal. Having regard to the above, the Second Appeal is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Second Appeal, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE V.SRINIVAS 25th July, 2025. Tsy