- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32030 MFA No. 3809 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 3809/2025 (ECA) BETWEEN: MANAGER (LEGAL DEPT), SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., NO.4/5, S.V.ARCADE, 3RD FLOOR, BILEKAHALLI MAIN ROAD, OPP. TO BANNERUGHATTA ROAD, BENGALURU-560 076, REP. BY ITS MANAGER. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. ANUP SEETHARAM RAO., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MR AYUB, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, W/O MR. REHAMATHULLA, RESIDENT OF RAJEEV GANDHI NAGAR, TUMAKURU TOWN, KASABA HOBLI, TUMAKURU TALUK PIN-572 105. 2. MR. ASLAM, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, S/O MR. MAQBUL, RESIDENT OF BADAGI KOPPALU, KUSHALNAGAR, SAKALESHPURA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT PIN-571 234. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MALLIKARJUN .B RYAKHA, ADVOCATE FOR R1) Digitally signed by MADHURI S Location: High court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32030 MFA No. 3809 of 2025 THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 30(1) EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 20.12.2024 PASSED IN ECA NO. 14/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, TUMAKURU, AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS.9,98,304 WITH INTEREST AT 12 PERCENT PA. FROM 25.02.2020 TILL REALIZATION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA ORAL JUDGMENT This appeal is filed by the appellant/claimant under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 challenging the judgment and award dated 20.12.2024 passed in ECA No. 14/2020 on the file of the Prl. Senior Civil Judge and CJM, Tumakuru, to examine and modify the award and to assess the compensation. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant who is a workman sustained injuries and filed claim petition, claiming compensation of Rs.10 lakhs and the tribunal granted Rs.9,98,304/- with interest at the rate of 12% p.a., from 20.5.2020, i.e., one month subsequent to the accident till the realization. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32030 MFA No. 3809 of 2025 3. During the pendency of the appeal, both parties appeared before the Court along with their counsels and filed joint compromise petition under XXIII Rule 3 of the CPC. 4. Learned counsel for both sides are present. Vakalath filed by learned counsel for respondent No.1 before this court, is hereby accepted. 5. Submission of both the parties is placed on record. In view of joint compromise between the parties and in terms of the compromise, this appeal is disposed of . SD/- (P SREE SUDHA) JUDGE AKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 3