Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:136780-DB Court No. - 39 Case :- FIRST APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 682 of 2025 Appellant :- Raghuvendra Singh Yadav Respondent :- Smt. Chandni And 2 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Rahul Saxena Counsel for Respondent :- Dan Bahadur Yadav,Mohd Hasnain Hon'ble Arindam Sinha,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J. 1. Mr. Arpit Agarwal, learned advocate holding brief of Mr. Rahul Saxena, appears on behalf of applicant- appellant- grand father. He submits, his client is aggrieved by order dated 1st May, 2025 of the Family Court granting visitation right to respondent mother. She is accused of murdering his son. The appeal was presented on reported delay of 29 days. On query Mr. Agarwal submits, by impugned order the application for interim custody was disposed of. The petition for custody remains to be decided. 2. Mr. Mohd. Hasnain, learned advocate appears on behalf of respondents. 3. By judgement dated 5th August, 2025 of a Bench, to which one of us was party (Arindam Sinha,J), carrying different concurring views, it was held that order for interim custody is an interlocutory order, from which appeal is not maintainable. As such, there is no necessity to direct issuance of notice. The application and appeal are dismissed. This will not prevent applicant- appellant from finding his remedy as may be available in law. Order Date :- 12.8.2025 Bhanu (Arindam Sinha, J.) (Prashant Kumar) Digitally signed by :- BHANU PRATAP KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- BHANU PRATAP KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad