SMT SAENA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (HOME) AND ANOTHER
CRLRD/1005/2024 · 2025-09-24
Tej Pratap Tiwari
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 71412 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 71412 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 1005 of 2024 Court No. - 88 HON'BLE TEJ PRATAP TIWARI, J.
1. Case called out in the revised list.
2. Vide order dated 4.07.2024 of this Court, notice was duly served to the opposite party No.2 and thereafter opposite party No.2 was allowed to file objection, if any. The steps were suppose to be taken within a week. As per the office report dated 25.09.2025, notice has been personally served upon opposite party No.2.
3. In the interest of justice, in the absence of learned counsel for the revisionist, the instant criminal Revision (Defective No. 1005 of 2024) is dismissed for want of prosecution. September 25, 2025 NSC Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Pawan Kumar Pandey, Ram Yash Chauhan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Azhar Hussain, G.A. (Tej Pratap Tiwari,J.) Smt Saena And Another .....Revisionist(s) State Of U.P Through Its Principal Secretary (Home) And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- NARENDRA SINGH CHAUDHARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad