Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 71410 (KAR)

SRI THIMMAIAH v. SRI RAMASWAMY

RSA/698/2014 · 2025-08-18

Anant Ramanath Hegde

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31882 RSA No. 698 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 698 OF 2014 (DEC) BETWEEN: SRI. THIMMAIAH S/O DODDA THIMMAIAH AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS R/O NALLIMARADAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK - 562 101. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. D.S. VIJAYENDRA REDDY, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: SRI. RAMASWAMY DIED BY HIS LRS., 1. SMT. RAMAKKA W/O LATE RAMASWAY, AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS 2. SRI NARAYANA SWAMY S/O LATE RAMASWAMY AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 3. SRI. BYRAREDDY S/O LATE RAMASWAMY AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS RESPONDENT LR'S Digitally signed by C HONNUR SAB Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31882 RSA No. 698 of 2014 4. SMT. SHARADAMMA S/O LATE RAMASWAMY AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS 5. SMT. RATHNAMMA S/O LATE RAMASWAMY AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS ALL ARE R/O NALLIMARADAHALLI LVILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK - 562 101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. P.N. VARADARAJA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R5; R1 - APPEAL ABATED VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 26.03.2025) THIS RSA IS FILED U/S. 100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED 21.02.2014 PASSED IN R.A.NO.47/2007 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CHICKBALLAPUR, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 28.11.2006 PASSED IN OS.NO.197/2004 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) AND JMFC, CHICKABALLAPUR. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE ORAL JUDGMENT It is submitted that appellant died on 17.12.2023. Memo filed by counsel for respondents to this effect and same is taken on record. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31882 RSA No. 698 of 2014 None appears for the appellant. The appeal is dismissed as abated. Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23 CT: BHK