Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 71397 (BOM)

JAYSINGH NARAYAN ARKAD v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

APEAL/111/2011 · 2025-11-25

Shri Shivkumar Dige

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

6-APEAL-111-2011 (CR).DOC Harish IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 111 OF 2011 Jaysingh Narayan Arkad ...Appellant Versus The State Of Maharashtra ...Respondent ------- Mr. Khatawkar and Mr. Shreyas Karajgar for the Appellant. Mr. P. P. Deokar APP for the State. ------- CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATE : 25th NOVEMBER, 2025. P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Appellant and learned APP for the Respondent-State. 2. Learned counsel for the Appellant submits that during pendency of the Appeal the Appellant is expired. Hence, seeks leave to withdraw this appeal. 3. Considering the submission of learned counsel for the Appellant, Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn. 4. The Criminal Appeal is dismissed and disposed off as withdrawn. (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) HARISH VITHAL CHAUDHARI Digitally signed by HARISH VITHAL CHAUDHARI Date: 2025.11.27 19:41:50 +0530