SATYA NARAYAN AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 9 OTHERS
WRIC/21063/2025 · 2025-07-07
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 71347 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 71347 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:107107 Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 21063 of 2025 Petitioner :- Satya Narayan And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 9 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Mishra,Shri Krishna Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi,C.S.C. Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:-
"Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent No.2 to decide the stay application filed on 08.07.2019 in Revision No. 869/2019 (Satya Narayan and others vs. Subedar and others) expeditiously within stipulated period."
2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that stay application has been filed on 08.07.2019 in Revision No.869 of 2019 (Satya Narayan & Ors. vs. Subedar & Ors.), which is pending consideration before respondent no. 2. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is for expeditious disposal of the same.
3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon respondent No.2 to decide stay application dated 08.07.2019 in Revision No.869 of 2019 (Satya Narayan & Ors. vs. Subedar & Ors.), in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of three weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
4. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of.
5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. Order Date :- 8.7.2025 Kushal Digitally signed by :- KUSHAL AGRAWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad