Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010025442025 2025:GAU-AS:8698 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/71/2025 ON THE DEATH OF JATIN CHANDRA SHARMA HISLEGAL HEIRS S/O- LATE LOK NATH SARMAH, RESIDENT OF MAGZINE, VIP ROAD, SHANKAR NAGAR, BAY LANE 1, PO UDHYANBIHAR, GUWAHATI, KAMRUP METRO, ASSAM 1.1- JAYANTI SHARMA, AGED 60, W/O-LATE JATIN CHANDRA SARMAH, RESIDENT OF MAGZINE, VIP ROAD, SHANKAR NAGAR, BAY LANE 1, PO UDHYANBIHAR, GUWAHATI, KAMRUP METRO, ASSAM, 1.2- SWANDEEP SARMAH, AGED 26, S/O-LATE JATIN CHANDRA SARMAH, RESIDENT OF MAGZINE, VIP ROAD, SHANKAR NAGAR, BAY LANE 1, PO UDHYANBIHAR, GUWAHATI, KAMRUP METRO, ASSAM, 2: SWANDEEP SARMAH RESIDENT OF MAGZINE VIP ROAD SHANKAR NAGAR BAY LANE1 PO UDHYANBIHAR GUWAHAT VERSUS SRI RUPJYOTI PHUKAN RESIDENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OIL INDIA LIMITED, FIELD HEADQUARTERS, DULIAJAN, DIBRUGARH, PIN-786602 2:ARUN JYOTI BARUAH CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER OIL INDIA LIMITED PIPELINE HEADQUARTERS P.O- UDAYAN VIHAR NARENGI GUWAHATI-71 Page No.# 2/3 3:JAYANTA HAZARIKA GENERAL MANAGER OIL INDIA LIMITED PIPELINE SERVICES P.O- UDAYAN VIHAR NARENGI GUWAHATI-7 Advocate for the Petitioner : PANKAJ JYOTI PATAR, MR. K M MAHANTA,MR K K MAHANTA (Sr. Advocate) Advocate for the Respondent : MR. D SAIKIA (R-1,3), A BARTHAKUR (R-1),H BARUAH(R- 1,2),MR P NAYAK(R-1,3),MR P NAYAK(R-1,3,2),H BARUAH(R-1,3),A BARTHAKUR(R-1,3) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Date : 26.06.2025 1. Heard Mr. K. M. Mahanta, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P. Nayak, learned counsel appearing for all the respondents. 2. Mr. P. Nayak, learned counsel, has placed on record a communication dated 10.06.2025, issued by the respondents, to the son of the writ petitioner (Late Jatin Chandra Sarmah). 3. A perusal of the said communication would reveal that the amount of Rs.23,97,895.65/-(Rupees Twenty Three Lakh Ninety Seven Thousand Eight Hundred Ninety Five and Sixty Five Paise only) directed to be refunded to the writ petitioner by this Court, has been so refunded. Further, the other pensionary benefits receivable by the writ petitioner has also been released to the family of the writ petitioner. 4. In view of the above, this Court is of the considered view that the directions passed by this Court vide the order dated 26.09.2023 in Page No.# 3/3 WP(C).No.8048/2017, has been substantially complied with. 5. Accordingly, the contempt petition stands closed. 6. Notices issued stand recalled. 7. A copy of the communication dated 10.06.2025, furnished by learned counsel Mr. P. Nayak, is kept on record and marked as ‘X’. JUDGE Comparing Assistant