1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2025 CONCILIATOR PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K & SMT. NALINA K, MEMBER CRL.RP.No.1410/2022 (Lok Adalat No.1488/2025) BETWEEN SRI. R KRISHNA S/O T.S. RAMA MURTHY SHETTY AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.15, 5TH CROSS 8TH MAIN, GANESHA BLOCK RHBCS LAYOUT MAHALAKSHMI LAYOUT BENGALURU-560 086 ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. AMARUTH A.N, ADVOCATE) AND M/S SPD CHITS ® PVT LTD A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT 1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO. 25/62 6TH CROSS, NEAR PANCHAMUKHI GANESHA TEMPLE, BENGALURU-560 058 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR AND AUTHORISED SIGNATORY SUBRAMANYA V AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. V.D. RAVIRAJ & R. HARIPRASAD, ADVOCATES) 2 THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (CCH-61) AT BENGALURU IN CRL.A.NO.401/2021 DATED 16.09.2022 AND JUDGMENT PASSED BY THE HONOURABLE XXVII ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, BENGALURU IN C.C.NO.20372/2019 DATE 17.04.2021 AND TO ACQUIT THE PETITIONER OF THE CHARGE U/S 138 OF NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, BY ALLOWING THIS CRL.RP. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: CONCILIATION ORDER The parties and their respective counsel are present. It is submitted that the matter is settled amicably between the parties and agreed that the petitioner-accused is ready to settle the dispute for a sum of Rs.4,00,000/- in total and out of which, Rs.2,50,000/- has already been deposited before the Trial Court. It is further agreed that the balance amount of sum of Rs.1,50,000/- will be paid on or before 10.10.2025. In view of the above, the respondent is permitted to withdraw the amount deposited before the Trial Court. In case of failure to pay the balance amount of Rs.1,50,000/-, the respondent is at liberty to proceed to take appropriate action against the petitioner. 3 The petitioner is permitted to deposit the balance amount before the Trial Court by way of demand draft. Upon such deposit, the respondent is permitted to withdraw the same. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of in terms of joint memo. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER CR