Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:7180 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPMS/1267/2022 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
1. Mr. T.C. Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Ms. Ruchika Negi, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Sandeep Kothari, learned counsel for the respondent.
3. As per letter dated 29.07.2025, received from Civil Judge (S.D.), New Tehri, District Tehri Garhwal, Original Suit No. 37 of 2019 was decided on
12.03.2025.
4. Since petitioner has challenged an interlocutory order passed in the said Original Suit, therefore, after decision in the suit, the relief, as claimed in the writ petition, do not survive.
5.
Learned counsel for the parties are also unanimous that the writ petition has become infructuous.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed, as infructuous.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J)
14.08.2025 Aswal
NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Digitally signed by NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eacc6757ee7881e933ff8934f07477005aa85f9802a3a08b08d1369512ea30f3, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=44EB54CBF00B7698CB6F10C2CE3D26F5C22DACF4F4610C1FE58A58531726 FBB0, cn=NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Date: 2025.08.14 02:35:01 -07'00'
2025:UHC:7180