Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 71279 (KAR)

JALALI SAILESH BHAI VASUDEV ALIAS JETHI BHIMSEN VASUDEV v. SURESH M ALIAS SURESH JETTY

MFA/1368/2024 · 2025-07-12

Lok Adalath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JULY 2025 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C M POONACHA & SRI. SUBRAHMANYA. P D, MEMBER M.F.A.No.1368/2024 (MV) (Lok Adalat No.5365/2025) BETWEEN: 1. JALALI SAILESH BHAI VASUDEV @ JETHI BEIMSEN VASUDEV S/O VASUDEV JALALI, AGE 65 YEARS, CARPENTER, R/O VRAJ MUSHTHI AKHALA, OPP. LOKAMANYA SOCIETY, WARASHIYA, FATEPURA, VADODARA DISTRICT, GUJARAT STATE, NOW R/O KELAGOTE, CHITRADURGA - 577 501, ...APPELLANT (By Sri.R SHASHIDHARA, Advocate) AND 1. SURESH M @ SURESH JETTY S/O MANJUNATHA JETTY, AGE 42 YEARS, R.C OWNER OF CAR BEARING NO.KA-55/6131, R/O NO.858, N.K. PURA, 2 KYATHAMARANAHALLI, MYSORE TOWN, MYSORE CITY, KARNATAKA - 570001. 2. THE BRANCH MANAGER, UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD., AKKAMAHADEVI ROAD, MMK COMPLEX, P.J.EXTENSION, DAVANAGERE-577001, 3. FAYAZUDDIN S/O M.K.SIRAJUDDIN, AGE 52 YEARS, OWNER OF LORRY BEARING NO.KA-16/A-5512, PROPRIETOR OF SMST TRANSPORT, R/O NEAR SRI MURGHASWAMY MUTT ROAD, KAVADIGARAHATTI, CHITRADURGA-577 501, 4. THE BRANCH MANAGER, RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., NO.1 AND 2, 1ST FLOOR, MAGANOOR COMMERCIAL COMPLEX, NEARBY KSRTC BUS STAND, B.D.ROAD, CHITRADURGA-577501, .…RESPONDENTS (By Sri.S KRISHNA KISHORE, Advocate for R-2) MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 07.11.2018 PASSED IN MVC NO.509/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND MACT, CHITRADURGA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. 3 THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED. CONCILIATION ORDER The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant - Claimant is present through video conferencing/physical hearing. The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent – Insurance Company along with its representative are present. 2. After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned advocate appearing for the appellant/claimant (being authorized by the appellant/claimant to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the respondent- Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed. The appellant-claimant has agreed to receive and the respondent- Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.1,40,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Forty Thousand only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim. 4 3. The Respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of award, failing which the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit. 4. The entire enhanced compensation amount shall be released in favour of the appellant / claimant, on proper identification. 5. This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER GSR