Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33691 RFA No. 2291 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.2291 OF 2023 (POS)
BETWEEN:
FARHANA BANU W/O MUSHTAQ AHMED, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, RESIDING AT #435, 1ST FLOOR, CHOWDAPPA LAYOUT, KARNATAKA INDIA-560027 MOBILE CONTACT: +91-9880320524. …APPELLANT
(BY SRI SREEDHARA C.G., ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
R. DHANAPAL S/O LATE RAMASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, RESIDING AT #435, 1ST FLOOR, CHOWDAPPA LAYOUT, KARNATAKA, INDIA-560027 MOBILE NO: +91-9620293956. …RESPONDENT
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 R/W ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 11.08.2023 PASSED IN O.S.NO.1335/2017 ON THE FILE OF 17TH ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSION JUDGE AT BENGALURU., DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR POSSESSION.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
Digitally signed by MAHALAKSHMI B M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33691 RFA No. 2291 of 2023
ORAL JUDGMENT
There is no representation on behalf of the appellant.
2. This Court on 23.08.2025, noting the absence of the appellant’s counsel and non-compliance of the office objection for sixth time, directed the matter to be listed under the caption ‘dismissal’.
3. Today i.e., 29.08.2025, neither the office objections have been complied with nor the appellant’s counsel is present.
4. The matter is of the year 2023.
5. It, therefore, appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution.
Sd/- _____________________ JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
AT List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29