- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49025 WP No. 5388 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 5388 OF 2023 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: SRI SADASHIVA ACHARYA S/O NARAYAN ACHARYA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/AT NEERCHALA, U M NAGARA BELA, POST BELA, KASARAGODU TALUK AND DISTRICT, KERALA STATE-671321. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. K B LOKANATH., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, BENGALURU-560001. 3. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL AND INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU-560001. 4. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE UDUPI DISTRICT, Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49025 WP No. 5388 of 2023 UDUPI-567181. 5. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR KUNDAPURA TOWN POLICE, KUNDAPURA, UDUPI DISTRICT-567101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.MAHANTESH SHETTAR., AGA) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R- 1 TO 3 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DTD 25.01.2023 PERTAINS TO SRI KALIKAMBA JEWELLERY WORKS, NEERCHALA, KASARGKODU TALUK AGAINST THE R-4 FOR THEIR ILLEGAL ACT IS HEREWITH PRODUCED VIDE ANNX-D, E AND F AND DIRECT THE R-3 THE POLICE COMMISSIONER, UDUPI DIST. TO ENTRUST THIS MATTER TO COD FOR DETAILED ENQUIRY FOR THE ILLEGAL ACT OF THE R-4 POLICE, KUNDAPURA POLICE STATION AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. In this writ petition, the petitioner has sought for a direction to respondents No.1 to 3 to consider the representations dated 25.01.2023 (Annexures 'D', 'E' and 'F') against respondent No.4 is concerned. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49025 WP No. 5388 of 2023 2. I have heard Sri K.B.Lokanath, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri Mahantesh Shettar, learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondents. 3. Having taken note of the averments made in the representations produced at Annexures 'D', 'E' and 'F', I am of the view that, the direction cannot be issued at this stage for consideration of the prayer, as the petitioner is having an alternative remedy before the competent authority. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE JT/- CT: JL