SRI H HANUMANTHAIAH v. SHREE ANJANEYASWAMY VIDHYAPEETA(R)
WP/28182/2023 · 2025-12-01
E S Indiresh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 71258 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 71258 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49807 WP No. 28182 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 28182 OF 2023 (GM-KSR) BETWEEN:
1.
SRI H HANUMANTHAIAH S/O LATE GIDDA HANUMAPPA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
2.
SRI B VENKATESHA MURTHY S/O LATE P BALAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
3.
SRI A KRISHNAPPA S/O A ANJINAPPA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
ALL THE PETITIONERS ARE R/AT DOMMATHAMARI VILLAGE PAVAGADA TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT-561202. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. NAGARAJA S., ADV.)
AND:
1.
SHREE ANJANEYASWAMY VIDHYAPEETA (R) DOMMATAMARI PAVAGADA TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT TUMKUR-561202 REP. BY ITS SECRETARY.
Digitally signed by NANJUNDACHARI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49807 WP No. 28182 of 2023
2.
THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR OF SOCIETIES TUMKUR SUB-DIVISION TUMKUR DISTRICT TUMKUR-561202 REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.S.K. VENKATAREDDY, ADV. FOR R1 SRI MAHANTESH SHETTAR, AGA FOR R2)
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTION BY QUASHING BY THE IMPUGNED ORDER IN SOC NO.46/1969-70 DATED 17.05.2023 PASSED BY THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR OF SOCIETIES VIDE ANNEXURE-D AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
ORAL ORDER
Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.
2. In this petition, the petitioners are assailing the order dated 17.05.2023 (Annexure-D) issued by respondent No.2.
3. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and taking into consideration the order dated 17.05.2023, that has been passed by respondent No.2 at
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49807 WP No. 28182 of 2023
the instance of the petitioners to redress their grievance in an appropriate proceedings and accordingly the proceedings came to an ended.
4. In that view of the matter, no interference is called for in this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed of.
Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
MPK CT:bms List No.: 1 Sl No.: 48