Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7125 (UTT)

MILAN RASTOGI v. AMIT RASTOGI

WPMS/1459/2019 · 2025-09-26

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPMS No.1459 of 2019 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Hemant Singh Mahra, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Ms. Gyanmati Kushwaha, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Vikas Anand, learned counsel for the respondent. 3. It is contended by learned counsel for the parties that the present writ petition has rendered infructuous as the divorce petition filed by the respondent- husband, from which, the present proceedings arises has been dismissed for non-prosecution in the year 2023. 4. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the parties, the present writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 26.09.2025 AK