APHC010070572019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] WEDNESDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 3172/2019 Between: 1. Y V RAO, S/O RAMA SESHAGIRI RAO, PROPRIETOR OF YARLAGADDA GRANDEUR AGED 43 YEARS, R/O 9-3, K.L.N.K NAGAR, KANURU, PENAMALURU MANDAL, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH 2. THE COMMISSIONER, A.P CAPITAL REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. KANURU GRAM PANCHAYAT, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, PENAMALURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an order, writ or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declare the House Tax demand notice vide receipt no. 4805 for we years 2017-2018 and the House Tax demand notice vide receipt no.53781 for the years 2018-2019 which were served on the petitioner with revised door number Dr-11-3 in R.S.No.227/3 in Kanuru village, Penamaluru Mandal, Krishna District by the 3rd respondent in respect of 2 Convention Center i.e., YARLAGADDA GRANDUER without even issuing the mandatory statutory notice to the petitioner, as being illegal, arbitrary, in violation of Principles of Natural Justice, contrary to provisions of Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 and G.O.Ms.No.30, P.R and R.D dated.10- 01-1995 and consequentially set aside the House Tax demand notice vide receipt no 4805 for the years 2017-2018 and the House Tax demand notice vide receipt no. 53781 for the years 2018-2019, and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble High Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay the demand made by the 3rd Respondent for the payment House Tax vide: receipt no: 4805 for the years 2017-2018 and the House Tax demand notice vide receipt no:53781 for the years 2018-2019 which were served on the petitioner with revised door number Dr-11-3 in R.S.No.227/3 in Kanuru village, Penamaluru Mandal, Krishna District till the pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KILARU NITHIN KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. G SESHADRI(SC FOR MPP ZPP) 2. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 3172/2019 ORDER: Heard Sri B.Pavan, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri B.Pavan, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive and no further adjudication is necessary in the present Writ Petition. Therefore, the Writ Petition becomes infructuous. Recording the said submission, Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 30.07.2025 TTPPSS 4 135 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 3172/2019 30.07.2025 TTPPSS 5