IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.4039 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-275 Year-2018 Thana- BIRAUL District- Darbhanga ====================================================== 1. Vimlesh Yadav Son of Ramanand Yadav Resident of Village- Akauna, P.S.- Biraul, Distt.- Darbhanga 2. Awadhesh Yadav @ Avadhesh Kumar Yadav Son of Ramanand Yadav Resident of Village- Akauna, P.S.- Biraul, Distt.- Darbhanga 3. Ramanand Yadav Son of Late Sukan Yadav Resident of Village- Akauna, P.S.- Biraul, Distt.- Darbhanga 4. Kedar Yadav Son of Musharu Yadav Resident of Village- Akauna, P.S.- Biraul, Distt.- Darbhanga 5. Badri Yadav Son of Musharu Yadav Resident of Village- Akauna, P.S.- Biraul, Distt.- Darbhanga ... ... Appellant/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Prabhu Paswan Son of Late Bhola Paswan Resident of Village- Akauna, P.S.- Biraul, Distt.- Darbhanga ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Saroj Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mrs.Usha Kumari 1, Spl. P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 5 17-02-2025 Learned counsel for the appellants undertakes to remove the defect(s) pointed out by the office. 2. Heard Mr. Saroj Kumar learned counsel for the appellants and Mr. Girish Chandra Jha representing the informant and Mrs. Usha Kumari no.1, learned Spl. P.P. 3. The present memo of appeal has been preferred to set aside the order dated 23.9.2021 passed by the 1st Addl. Sessions Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.4039 of 2024(5) dt.17-02-2025 2/2 Judge cum Special Judge, SC/ST (POA), Darbhanga, whereby the learned Special Judge, SC/ST (POA), Act Darbhanga has been pleased to take cognizance offences u/ss 147,149,323,341,427,504 of the L.P.C. and Section 3(1)(r), 3(1) (s), 3(2) (va) of SC/ST POA Act and issued summon against the appellants and others in SC/ST G.R. Case No. 238/18 arising out of Biraul P.S. Case No. 275/2018. 4. After some argument, learned counsel for the appellants prays for withdrawal of the petition with liberty to take appropriate steps after the Court concerned decides on their discharge petition. 5. The appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. Ravi/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U T